Welcome to the new SeyLII website. Enjoy an improved search engine and new collections. If you are used to accessing SeyLII via Google, note Google will take some time to re-index the site.

We are still busy migrating some of the old content. If you need anything in particular from the old website, it will be available for a while longer at https://old.seylii.org/

Court name
Supreme Court
Case number
Criminal Side 34 of 2006
Counsel for plantiff
Mr. Govinden

Republic v Malvina (Criminal Side 34 of 2006) [2007] SCSC 68 (09 March 2007);

Media neutral citation
[2007] SCSC 68
Counsel for defendant
Mr. Bonte
Gaswaga, J







Criminal Side No. 34 of 2006


Mr. Govinden for the Republic

Mr. Bonte for the Accused




The accused, now convict, has pleaded guilty to the offence of wounding with intent to maim, disfigure or to do some grievous harm to a person contrary to section 219 of the Penal Code. There is no doubt that this is a very serious offence which upon conviction would lead to a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The Court has considered the mitigation as put across by Mr. Bonte on behalf of the convict. Further, for the Court to determine what would be an appropriate sentence in this case the circumstances under which the offence was committed and the injuries inflicted on the victim as brought to light by the prosecution have been considered too. I am disregarding the previous convictions as the court was advised that they now stand spent.

The convict, who is a fisherman, is aged 48 years with three children who are all adults. He has saved the precious time of the Court and shown remorse by pleading guilty. In these circumstances I feel a sentence of three and half years would be suitable. The time spent on remand should count towards this sentence.


I so order.




day of March, 2007