Welcome to the new SeyLII website. Enjoy an improved search engine and new collections. If you are used to accessing SeyLII via Google, note Google will take some time to re-index the site.

We are still busy migrating some of the old content. If you need anything in particular from the old website, it will be available for a while longer at https://old.seylii.org/

Court name
Supreme Court
Case number
46 of 2009

Republic v Scholes & Anor (46 of 2009) [2009] SCSC 145 (06 December 2009);

Media neutral citation
[2009] SCSC 145
Coram
Gaswaga, J

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SEYCHELLES

 

THE REPUBLIC

VS.

  1. STEPHEN SCHOLES

  2. TERRENCE STEWART

 

Criminal Side No. 46 of 2009

 

 

Mr. Esparon standing in for

Mr. Govinden, the Attorney General for the Republic

Mr. Hoareau for the 1st Accused

Mr. Elizabeth for the 2nd Accused

 

ORDER

 

Gaswaga, J

 

Having convicted both accused persons on their own plea of guilty on count 9 of “Uttering a false document contrary to section 339 read with section 23 and punishable under section 339 of the Penal Code” whose particulars are that “Stephen Scholes and Terence Stewart with common intention on the 4th of September, 2009, at Victoria, Mahe, knowingly and fraudulently uttered a false document to Barclays Bank, namely an agreement between GESTION GUPO GUARDIAN S.L and FAST TRADING GROUP dated the 27th of April, 2009 purporting to offer a credit line of USD 900 million”, and sentenced each one of them to a fine of USD 225, 000, in default to serve six (6) months in prison, I hereby make the following orders:

  1. That the said total fine of USD450, 000/- be paid into Court by the receiver (appointed by the Court in an order dated 11th November, 2009) out of the sum of USD868, 553.09, currently being held by Barclays Bank (Seychelles) in account number 7669264 in the name of Guardian Environmental Holdings Limited.

 

  1. That as agreed and authorized by the accused persons, the said receiver transfers the balance of the monies thereof to the account of Mr. Elizabeth, the second accused’s lawyer.

 

  1. That pursuant to Section 33 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act 2006 as amended by the Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Act 2008 the laptop currently in the hands of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) be and is hereby forfeited to the state. However, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) is to provide a mirror image thereof to the second accused person.

 

  1. That upon the said fine being paid into the Court:

 

  1. The Registrar of the Supreme Court is to return the accused persons passports immediately. The other items also confiscated from the accused persons by the FIU are to be returned to the accused.

 

  1. Mr. Liam Hogan, the appointed receiver herein and the restraint order of 11th November, 2009 issued under section 27 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act 2006 as amended by the Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Act 2008 emanating from the miscellaneous proceedings hereof shall be discharged pursuant to section 27(5) and (6) of the said Act and the accused persons will be set free.

It is accordingly ordered.

 

 

 

D. GASWAGA

JUDGE

Dated this 7th day of December, 2009.