Welcome to the new SeyLII website. Enjoy an improved search engine and new collections. If you are used to accessing SeyLII via Google, note Google will take some time to re-index the site.

We are still busy migrating some of the old content. If you need anything in particular from the old website, it will be available for a while longer at https://old.seylii.org/

Court name
Supreme Court
Case number
CO 76 of 2015

Republic v Francoise (CO 76 of 2015) [2016] SCSC 107 (12 February 2016);

Media neutral citation
[2016] SCSC 107
Coram
Burhan, J
 

 

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SEYCHELLES

Criminal Side: CO 76/2015

 

[2016] SCSC 107

 

 

THE REPUBLIC

 

versus

 

TONY FRANCOISE

Accused

 


Heard:                              

Counsel:                   Amanda Faure  for the Republic

                                Nichol Gabriel for the Accused

                                     

Delivered:                12th February 2016     


SENTENCE


 

Burhan M

 

[1]      I have considered the facts placed by the learned counsel in mitigation before Court.  The most important is the fact that the accused has pleaded guilty without wasting the time of the Court, thereby expressing remorse and regret at the very first instance and expecting leniency of court.

[2]      I also note that the accused is only 28 years of age, the father of a young child and it appears that as stated by learned counsel, he is the sole bread winner in the family as the mother of the child is having a hearing impairment. 

[3]     I have considered the mitigating circumstances and the fact that the Honourable Attorney General has filed as a lesser charge considering the circumstance of this case, I intend imposing a sentence which would give an opportunity for the accused to reform himself. However at the same time I take into consideration that the drug concerned is a Class A Drug heroine and the deleterious effects it has on society especially the young children.

[4]      I am therefore of the view that an incarcerated term of imprisonment is compulsory.  However considering all the strong mitigatory facts put forward by learned counsel, I proceed to sentence the accused to a term of 12 months imprisonment.

[5]      Time spent on remand shall count towards sentence.  The Convict can appeal within 30 working days.

 

 

Signed, dated and delivered at Ile du Port on 12 February 2016.

 

 

 

M. Burhan

JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT