Welcome to the new SeyLII website. Enjoy an improved search engine and new collections. If you are used to accessing SeyLII via Google, note Google will take some time to re-index the site.

We are still busy migrating some of the old content. If you need anything in particular from the old website, it will be available for a while longer at https://old.seylii.org/

Court name
Supreme Court
Case number
CO 63 of 2016
Counsel for plantiff

R v Maguerite (CO 63 of 2016) [2017] SCSC 345 (07 April 2017);

Media neutral citation
[2017] SCSC 345
Counsel for defendant
Dodin, J


Criminal Side: CO 63/2016

[2017] SCSC    






Counsel:                     Mr. Subramanian, State Counsel for the Republic

                                   Mr. Camille for the accused

Delivered:                    7 April 2017


Dodin J

I have heard counsel in mitigation. The Convict is 46 years old.  He is a father of two children, one 7 years old and another one is 16 months old who is actually ill in the hospital. He is a first offender and he has pleaded guilty.  He has saved the Court’s time and expenses of a trial.

I have heard learned counsel who has moved the Court to show leniency and not to impose a prison sentence on the Convict. I have considered all the mitigating factors and I have also considered all the aggravating factors under the Misuse of Drugs Act 2016.   I find no aggravating circumstances and no aggravating factors to warrant a sentence of imprisonment.

I impose for:-

-     Count 1, a fine of Rs45,000 on the Convict and

-     Count 2 a fine of Rs5, 000 totalling Rs50, 000.

He has 6 months to pay. He can pay by instalments.  In default of payment that is if he does not pay, a sentence of 2 years imprisonment would be activated.

He can appeal against the sentences within 30 working days.

Signed, dated and delivered at Ile du Port on 7 April 2017


G Dodin

Judge of the Supreme Court