versus
ROBERT LAI LAM
Heard: 5 November 2018
Counsel: Mr. Khalyaan, for the Republic
Mr. Camille for the
Delivered: 5 November 2018
[1] I have considered the application to remand the accused and the submissions made by learned Counsel in respect of bail. The charge of manslaughter attracts the term of life imprisonment. This in itself shows the seriousness of the offence with which the accused has been charged with.
[2] Learned Counsel drew the attention of the Court to the Jean Raguain case where the accused in that instant case was also charged with manslaughter and was also under the influence of alcohol, but the Court released him on bail. In that instant case the learned prosecution Counsel did not move to remand the accused and further the accused did not attempt to abscond from the scene of the accident. In this instant case, in addition to the seriousness of the charge, the accused had fled the scene of the accident and had to be apprehended elsewhere. This in itself shows substantial grounds that the accused might abscond from appearance in the case and also obstruct the course of justice. Fleeing the scene of the incident certainly does not show he was intending to face the consequences of justice. Therefore this Court is satisfied that substantial grounds exist to remand the accused. Learned Counsel for the prosecution has also referred to Court that in his safety it is best he be remanded, this is also taken into consideration by Court.
[3] For all the aforementioned conditions I proceed to remand the accused into custody. The accused is remanded for a period of two weeks, and he is to be brought to Court on the 19th of November 2018 at 9 a.m.
Signed, dated and delivered at Ile du Port on 5 November 2018
Judge of the Supreme Court
2