Welcome to the new SeyLII website. Enjoy an improved search engine and new collections. If you are used to accessing SeyLII via Google, note Google will take some time to re-index the site.

We are still busy migrating some of the old content. If you need anything in particular from the old website, it will be available for a while longer at https://old.seylii.org/

Court name
Supreme Court
Case number
47 of 2007

Republic v Boux (47 of 2007) [2007] SCSC 114 (14 November 2007);

Media neutral citation
[2007] SCSC 114
Gaswaga, J







Criminal Side No. 47 of 2007



Mr. Govinden for the Republic

Mr. Elizabeth for the Accused



Gaswaga, J


The accused herein was remanded in Mt Posee prison on allegations of trafficking in a controlled drug. On the 8th November, 2007 he made serious allegations against some prisons officers of the said prison facility that they had assaulted and also tortured him whereupon he moved the court to be released on bail or be removed from that prison to a more secure and safer place.


Mr. Govinden vehemently objected to the application and later on, after seeking further instructions from the prisons officers urged the Court to dismiss the application, which he considers to be baseless. Mr. Frank Elizabeth is conducting some investigations and yet to file further papers on or before the 19th November, 2007 in support of the accused’s application.


The court has not yet investigated nor heard further or sufficient evidence on the matter and therefore unable to pronounce itself or make appropriate orders.


In the interest of justice however, it was ordered that as the investigations continue and before the hearing and subsequent ruling scheduled for the 23rd of November, 2007, the accused should be remanded at the Central Police Station. The accused has now moved the court that he would want his family members to provide him with a special diet every day while in detention at the Central Police Station. Again Mr. Govinden has strongly objected to this application and submitted that all the detainees (accused inclusive) are well looked after and free to place orders of food to suit their dietary requirements.


This court has not seen any grounds to warrant special treatment for the accused who should indeed be treated like any other remandee without unjustified or uncalled for exception, and according to the law, rules and regulations governing such detention facilities.


This order is to be served on the Commissioner of Police, the Superintendent of Prisons as well as the accused person and or his counsel Mr. Elizabeth.


I so order.





Dated this 15th November, 2007.