Welcome to the new SeyLII website. Enjoy an improved search engine and new collections. If you are used to accessing SeyLII via Google, note Google will take some time to re-index the site.

We are still busy migrating some of the old content. If you need anything in particular from the old website, it will be available for a while longer at https://old.seylii.org/

Court name
Supreme Court
Case number
CO 65 of 2016
Counsel for plantiff
Ibrahim

R v Ernesta (CO 65 of 2016) [2017] SCSC 872 (27 September 2017);

Media neutral citation
[2017] SCSC 872
Counsel for defendant
C. Andre
Coram
Nunkoo, J

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SEYCHELLES

Criminal Side: CO 65/2016    

[2017] SCSC     


THE REPUBLIC

versus

IVAN BERNARD ERNESTA

Accused


Heard:                           

Counsel:                         Ms Ibrahim for the Republic

                                      Mr Clifford Andre for the accused

Delivered:                        28th of September 2017


SENTENCE


Nunkoo J

[1]        The Accused was charged of the offence of uttering threats to NDEA agent contrary to Section 16(6) b of the National Drugs Enforcement Act (Act 20 of 2008) and punishable under Section 17 (3) thereto.

[2]        Section 16(6) b provides as follows:

A person who –

utters or sends threats to or in any way, intimidates or menaces an NDEA agent or any member of his family of an NDEA agent;

[3]        Section 17 provides for the sentence which is a fine not exceeding Rs 5000,000.00 or a term of imprisonment not exceeding 20 years.

[4]        Accused pleaded guilty and was convicted.

[5]        In mitigation Learned Counsel stated that Accused is a first time offender aged 30 years. He has a cycle rental business at La Digue. He has a daughter who is ten years old and another child is due any time. Learned Counsel urged the court to believe that it was a mere exchange of words implying that accused’s threats should not be taken seriously.

[6]        The Court notes the very serious penalty attaching to this offence and is also aware of the very serious circumstances when a heavy sentence can be imposed.

[7]        In view of the fact that the accused pleaded guilty and taking into account the fact that accused is well established in his business which he has to run personally, a fine will meet the ends of justice. The court sentences accused to pay a fine of  Rs 5000.00

Signed, dated and delivered at Ile du Port on 28th of September 2017.

 

S Nunkoo

Judge of the Supreme Court